Dinophysis sacculus
dsaccuu9.jpg

Fig. 2. SEM. Cingulum with two well developed lists: anterior and posterior cingular lists. ACL=anterior cingular list; PCL=posterior cingular list.

dsaccu10.jpg

Fig. 3. SEM. Right sulcal list visible. C=cingulum; RSL=right sulcal list.

dsaccu11.jpg

Fig. 4. LM. Hypotheca resembles a sack. Left sulcal list extends half-way down ventral hypothecal margin. Cingulum separates small epitheca from larger hypotheca. Thecal areolae visible.

dsaccu12.jpg

Fig. 5. LM. This species has high morphological variability: hypothecal width and curvature of the hypothecal margins.

dsaccu13.jpg

Fig. 6. LM. Another morphological variant; slightly wider antapex than Fig. 3.

dsaccu14.jpg

Fig. 7. LM. Antapex with a few blunt projections. Deep thecal pores visible.

dsaccu15.jpg

Fig. 8. LM. Antapex with blunt projections.

dsaccu16.jpg

Fig. 9. SEM. Antapex with blunt projections. Smooth thecal surface with pores. Megacytic zone void of pores. M=megacytic zone.

dsaccuu2.jpg

Fig. 10. SEM. Smooth thecal surface.

dsaccuu3.jpg

Fig. 11. Line drawing. Morphotype from Stein (1883).

dsaccuu4.jpg

Fig. 12. Line drawing. Morphotype from Stein (1883).

dsaccuu5.jpg

Fig. 13. Line drawing. Morphotype from Stein (1883).

dsaccuu6.jpg

Fig. 14. SEM. Smooth thecal surface with pores.

dsaccuu7.jpg

Fig. 15. SEM. Coarsely areolated thecal surface with pores.

dsaccuu8.jpg

Fig. 16. SEM. Coarsely areolated thecal surface with pores.

%LABEL% (%SOURCE%)